Wednesday, February 23, 2011

偷偷的走

阿嬤怪阿公是「偷偷的走」。他走的時候,小雲帶阿嬤去新光醫院門診,家裡沒其他人(約兩點多,打電話問阿公,阿公有接電話),過了下午五點,阿嬤回到家,看到阿公已身倒在床前地板上,她試著叫醒「清阿!清阿!」,接著叫小雲打救護車,通知大舅媽「爸爸暈到了」。小雲聽119建議,對阿公做CPR,救護人員到時,也是CPR;告知家屬要送醫,阿嬤說:不用送醫了。事後我看了死亡書上寫著:心肺衰竭死於2月22日下午4時。
小雲說當她回家時,先看到廚房的瓦斯有小火苗燒著,聽到阿嬤叫她打119時,去房間看阿公,阿公眼睛睜開著,嘴巴張著,手已冰冷。

阿嬤描述著:阿公已換上乾淨的內褲,睡褲的兩管已穿到膝蓋下,躺在地上,一脚直伸,另一脚彎曲著;我們推測,阿公可能是站起來穿褲時倒地的。
本週一,阿公已做過肺功能檢查,預定週三斷層掃描。
我們每人都知道該照顧自己更多,也要照顧好阿嬤。

Sunday, February 06, 2011

好累

我厭倦念書,應付考試,承受教室裡不平等的權利。

學位只是一張紙

Friday, February 04, 2011

在美國工作

在異國工作的心情好複雜

要有禮貌但有不能太過於謙遜
遇到笨蛋又只好默默接受 (不然要怎樣,事後跟老闆說他是笨蛋嗎?)

寫e-mail的措辭要小心,確定用字和句意是對事不對人,沒有指責對方的意思。
適當的時候要打圓場和閉嘴。這些事情也許在職場上都是相同的,無論在哪一國。
但是當換了一種語言和文化,困難度就變得高。

華人中的禮多人不怪在西方並不適用。
不是你的錯就不要禮貌性的我不對

真是一大挑戰




Wednesday, February 02, 2011

Week 2 class 1

這個老師實在太機車了,所以我決定要好好記錄上課,期末evaluation時大電他一番。

He is arrogant. He constantly saying: do you know what I mean. He sets the rules that students should communicate to him in person because he does not listen to voice mails and have too many emails. He also said he will not reply to emails.

First, he does not show appreciating of students' questions, especially when the questions is simple but crucial. For example, what format does he want for the assignment. One student asked, "what is the font, size, etc?" He replied, in a way that the student asked a stupid question, " the standard size 12, margin one inch." He suggested that students' ought to think if the font is too small, it will be difficult for him to see. Another student inquire about spacing. He replied as if it is a dumb question that "it should be single space...the assignment is one page only. I don't want 250 words..."

Two, he give students nicknames. For example, he called some "math guy."

Three, he does not seem to prepare for "this" class. The slide used in this class was originally prepared for a speech outside of UMBC. In addition, this was not the topic listed in the syllabus. He said he was jump around, talking about what is the interesting topic or current. However, this course is a in a seminar format. Thus, the randomness is not all that appropriate.

Finally, throughout the class, he showed that his personal preference and interest is more important. Some examples include do not expect him to reply to e-mails or listen to voice mail (consequently, if message is not delivered, the student is accountable); set tedious rules on how the assignment should be turned in (e.g. Assignment # 1 3 Euro questions). While these are tiny things, it just show that this person is inconsiderate of others.

The classroom should not be a extreme unbalance of power, especially at higher education. Instructors and students should be mutually accountable. This is a required course for the students, so students have no choice but to take it. Is this instructor the only person to teach this course? Is this his choice of teaching it? If so, does that grant him the right to be a tyrant in the classroom?